Thursday, January 5, 2012

Casualty

I

He would drink by himself
And raise a weathered thumb
Towards the high shelf,
Calling another rum
And blackcurrant, without
Having to raise his voice,
Or order a quick stout
By a lifting of the eyes
And a discreet dumb-show
Of pulling off the top;
At closing time would go
In waders and peaked cap
Into the showery dark,
A dole-kept breadwinner
But a natural for work.
I loved his whole manner,
Sure-footed but too sly,
His deadpan sidling tact,
His fisherman's quick eye
And turned observant back.

Incomprehensible
To him, my other life.
Sometimes on the high stool,
Too busy with his knife
At a tobacco plug
And not meeting my eye,
In the pause after a slug
He mentioned poetry.
We would be on our own
And, always politic
And shy of condescension,
I would manage by some trick
To switch the talk to eels
Or lore of the horse and cart
Or the Provisionals.

But my tentative art
His turned back watches too:
He was blown to bits
Out drinking in a curfew
Others obeyed, three nights
After they shot dead
The thirteen men in Derry.
PARAS THIRTEEN, the walls said,
BOGSIDE NIL. That Wednesday
Everyone held
His breath and trembled.

II

It was a day of cold
Raw silence, wind-blown
Surplice and soutane:
Rained-on, flower-laden
Coffin after coffin
Seemed to float from the door
Of the packed cathedral
Like blossoms on slow water.
The common funeral
Unrolled its swaddling band,
Lapping, tightening
Till we were braced and bound
Like brothers in a ring.

But he would not be held
At home by his own crowd
Whatever threats were phoned,
Whatever black flags waved.
I see him as he turned
In that bombed offending place,
Remorse fused with terror
In his still knowable face,
His cornered outfaced stare
Blinding in the flash.

He had gone miles away
For he drank like a fish
Nightly, naturally
Swimming towards the lure
Of warm lit-up places,
The blurred mesh and murmur
Drifting among glasses
In the gregarious smoke.
How culpable was he
That last night when he broke
Our tribe's complicity?
'Now, you're supposed to be
An educated man,'
I hear him say. 'Puzzle me
The right answer to that one.'

III

I missed his funeral,
Those quiet walkers
And sideways talkers
Shoaling out of his lane
To the respectable
Purring of the hearse...
They move in equal pace
With the habitual
Slow consolation
Of a dawdling engine,
The line lifted, hand
Over fist, cold sunshine
On the water, the land
Banked under fog: that morning
I was taken in his boat,
The screw purling, turning
Indolent fathoms white,
I tasted freedom with him.
To get out early, haul
Steadily off the bottom,
Dispraise the catch, and smile
As you find a rhythm
Working you, slow mile by mile,
Into your proper haunt
Somewhere, well out, beyond...

Dawn-sniffing revenant,
Plodder through midnight rain,
Question me again.


This poem seemed to be one of the longest I found by Seamus Heaney. Although styled in a different form, with different stanza lengths, the author continued to use rhyme and to tell a story. The story line of this poem is very interesting, although the thoughts jumped from section to section, I could understand the narrator’s emotion.
Anaphora is used in this poem in lines 16-17 of part II, with the repetition of the word “whatever”, in “Whatever threats were phone || Whatever black flags waved.” Heaney also uses parallelism, throughout this and other poems. An example is line 2 and 3 of part III, with “quiet walkers and sideways talkers.”  This phrase also interests me, because one may expect the adjectives to modifying the opposite nouns. In part II from stanza one to two, the author uses another extended metaphor, “Unrolled its swaddling band, Lapping, tightening Til we were braced and bound Like brothers in a ring. But he would not be held At home by his own crowd.”
 

10 comments:

  1. In the three different section of the long poem, the first two were written in a third person, omniscient voice, while the last is written in first person. I'm not quite sure how all of the different parts of the poem fit together,what do you think the significance or message of the poem is?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This poem is centered around one person dealing with, or living with, alcoholism. The speaker of the poem seems to have somewhat of an understanding of what the person drinking is going through.

    I am not sure what the message of the poem is, but i think that the sections go together by having the first and second give information on the drinker and how it destroyed him, while the third discusses his funeral.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the speaker of the poem tries to convey the devastation one feels when watching an acquaintance suffer from alcoholism. Heaney alludes to an encounter between the speaker and the alcoholic at a bar through using words such as “quick stout” and “closing time” to establish the setting. However, it is clear that the speaker himself is not an alcoholic because his life is “incomprehensible” to the alcoholic. From the point of view of the speaker, the death of his acquaintance at the end of the first section seems to put a pall on the day, one “of cold / Raw silence”. I think that because the speaker feels this sadness and devastation, he does not attend the funeral in the third stanza because he “tasted freedom” by going out in the boat and wanted to free himself of the burden that a death resulting from alcoholism thrust upon him.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The meaning of this poem is elusive, because the speaker often switches between reminiscing about his friend before and after his death. However, the title "Casualty" suggests to me a tragic death that could have been prevented or avoided, perhaps, as the people before me have mentioned, death due to a lifestyle of alcoholism. Yet the speaker seems to be honoring the memory of his friend through the poem. He regretfully recalls their conversations over drinks and their trips in his friend's boat, when he "tasted freedom with him". Overall, the speaker's words indicate his deep regard for his friend; he "loved his whole manner" despite his flaws and addiction.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I must admit that I did a bit of research about Heaney and this poem before commenting on it. He is from Northern Ireland and the tragic event that the poem is about is in fact an event that occurred in real life. Louis O’Neill, the man who was described in the poem, was a local fisherman who died in a bombing in Northern Ireland due to catholic-protestant conflict. In the poem, Heaney seems to be fairly general in the characterization of the man, especially physically. I think this is so that the reader can imagine this man as anyone. By doing this, I believe Heaney is trying to prove that the Northern Ireland conflict is one that takes the live of many - those we know, and those we don't; however, the death of anyone in such a manner is a tragic loss. Personally, I love the poem, especially after reading the history of its origin.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I skimmed the previous comments but I agree with Kathleen in that it seems that the author is speaking of someone who suffered from alcoholism. I think he may be a friend though; closer than an acquaintance? To me, I think that the reason that it switches so quickly from scene to scene was because the speaker had many memories with this man which is why I believe they may have been close.

    I did not like the way this poem was written at first and actually stopped before finishing section I. But I came back to it a bit later and read it quickly and fluidly. I think it is just a style of poetry that I am not used to (though I have barely any experience reading poetry). Thus the second time, since I was a bit more familiar/comfortable with it, the new style didn't distract me, and I actually quite enjoyed it. It really feels to me like the poem version of a novella or short story. There are many types of poems, but one is to capture the most meaningful situations, images, and words, and I feel like this does that perfectly. I felt almost as if I was experiencing a movie/book without words because the poem was so well crafted that I focused on the images and feelings.

    I also liked the large number of gerunds used. It gave movement and action to the poem and added to the showing not telling affect.

    I think one effect of writing the last section in first person, is to show how much the death of this friend affected the speaker. It seems almost as if the speaker is trying to recount the sad story of his friend without showing his emotions for as long as possible (though it is dripping with emotion) but then /has/ to express how he feels.

    I really enjoyed this poem.

    ReplyDelete
  7. PS - I liked the simile, 'drank like a fish' when he was a fisherman. witty.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is rather a political piece of work, a mournful rebel is perfect for tagging.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Poet used his emotions going beyond a simple relationship rather a casualty there.

    ReplyDelete